i2Coalition Sends Letter Addressing Misuse of Super 301 Process
We submitted a comment in the form of a letter for the 2016 Special 301 Out of Cycle Review of Notorious Markets.
In some instances, law enforcement agencies have a legitimate need to access personal online data—but government access to data must be preceded by due process procedures set out in the 4th Amendment in regards to search and seizure.
United States law is clear on the privacy of phone calls and other non-digital communications: government officials and agencies need a search warrant based on probable cause to gain access. However, such protections don’t extend to email.
A warrant is needed for messages located on the computer of a sender or receiver, but messages older than 180 days can be obtained from the servers of Internet infrastructure providers and other third parties with only a subpoena or court order. A court order can be based on a standard lower than probable cause, and many agencies can issue themselves a subpoena without an outside judge.
We submitted a comment in the form of a letter for the 2016 Special 301 Out of Cycle Review of Notorious Markets.
The SXSW Picker is open once again! The i2Coalition is organizing two panels this year, as well as panels from i2Coalition members.
U.S. Government May Not Use A Warrant To Compel Production Of Data Outside The U.S.
Join the i2Coalition for educational sessions, workshops, panels, exclusives luncheons, networking events and more at HostingCon Global 2016 in New Orleans.
The clarifying amendments to Rule 41 would dramatically expand the hacking power of U.S. federal agencies.
Earlier this week the i2Coalition signed onto a letter opposing a request by the the FBI to expand surveillance powers by amending the ECPA.